Sam Altman’s short-lived ouster from OpenAI was boardroom power struggle


Further details of Altman’s 4.5-day dismissal from OpenAI have been leaked.

Altman is said to have pitted members of the board against each other to force Helen Toner, with whom he had a dispute over a paper, off the board. This was reported by The New Yorker’s Charles Duhigg, citing a source familiar with the events.

Decoding Intentions

Toner co-authored the paper “Decoding Intentions,” which criticizes the AI hype generated by ChatGPT and the “race to the bottom” in AI safety that it may have triggered.

At the same time, the paper praises OpenAI’s competitor Anthropic, which initially decided against releasing its chatbot Claude and only relented after ChatGPT was published, according to the paper.



“By delaying the release of Claude until another company put out a similarly capable product, Anthropic was showing its willingness to avoid exactly the kind of frantic corner-cutting that the release of ChatGPT appeared to spur,” the paper says.

Unlike OpenAI, Anthropic chose not to commercialize its technology to avoid further fueling the AI hype, the paper states.

Altman reportedly manipulated the board

The paper’s accusation that OpenAI had deliberately fueled the AI hype led to a confrontation between Altman and Toner. Altman then allegedly plotted against Toner and held one-on-one meetings with the board to replace Toner.

When the board members talked to each other, they realized that Altman had misrepresented some of the board’s statements as supporting Toner’s ouster. The source said that Altman tried to play the board members off against each other.

Altman himself allegedly described his approach as “ham-fisted”, but not manipulative. Some board members lacked experience and were intimidated by their responsibilities. He viewed the discussions as a “very normal and healthy boardroom debate.”


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top